MCC played a critical role in leading the consultation analysis, delivering:

1. Comprehensive Data Processing & Review

• Processed 55,000+ responses, including standardized campaign submissions and unique stakeholder inputs.
• Used data extraction techniques, including Python-based processing, to organize and categorize responses efficiently.
• Reviewed evidence cited in responses, ensuring that all claims were cross-checked with reliable sources.

2. Thematic & Quantitative Analysis

• Conducted thematic analysis to identify major areas of support and opposition across key questions.
• Summarized closed-question responses, highlighting the percentage of respondents supporting different checkpoint tests.
• Analyzed stakeholder perspectives on the Paris Agreement, energy security, investment risks, emissions benchmarks, and economic impact.

3. Policy Insights & Reporting

• Authored the final government consultation report, providing structured summaries of stakeholder positions.
• Outlined key areas where industry and public perspectives aligned or conflicted, allowing DESNZ to refine its policy approach.
• Provided recommendations on policy trade-offs, balancing climate concerns, energy security, and economic considerations.

4. Addressing Key Consultation Themes

Through our analysis, we identified key recurring themes in responses, including:

• Climate concerns: Many respondents cited the Paris Agreement, Climate Pact, and Net Zero commitments, arguing against further licensing.
• Energy security arguments: Some respondents supported continued licensing, emphasizing domestic production over reliance on imports.
• Checkpoint test criteria: Varied opinions emerged on how licensing decisions should be assessed, with debates on Scope 3 emissions, international benchmarking, and sector progress in energy transition technologies.

‍